home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Ian & Stuart's Australian Mac 1993 September
/
clonecd
/
September 93.img
/
Archives
/
Mac FAQ
/
Mac Applications.FAQ
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1993-09-13
|
33KB
Date: 8/9/93 8:08 AM
To: All
From: eharold@sunspot.noao.edu
Subject: Pt 1/3: Macintosh application s
From: eharold@sunspot.noao.edu (Elliotte Rusty Harold)
Organization: Department of Mathematics, NJIT
Archive-name: macintosh/apps-faq
Version: 2.1.1
Last-modified: August 14, 1993
Copyright 1993 by Elliotte Harold
Changes since the last version:
2.8: Electronic Publishing Software
PageMaker 5.0 has finally been released and has nearly
achieved feature parity with Quark. Given that and the
increasingly frequent complaints about Quark's service and
support, I'm reversing this recommendation.
comp.sys.mac.faq
Part 4: comp.sys.mac.apps
I. What's the Best...
1. Text editor
2. Word processor
3. Genealogy software
4. TeX/LaTeX
5. Integrated application
6. Spreadsheet
7. JPEG Viewer
8. Electronic publishing software
9. Drawing application
II. Microsoft Word
1. Character based styles
2. Cross-references
3. Word to TeX and back
4. How do I depersonalize Word?
5. Where can I get more information?
III. TeachText
1. How can I change the font in TeachText?
2. How do I place a picture in a TeachText file?
3. How do I make a TeachText document read-only?
This work is Copyright 1993 by Elliotte M. Harold
Permission is hereby granted to distribute this unmodified document
provided that no fee in excess of normal on-line charges is required for
such distribution. Portions of this document may be extracted and
quoted free of charge and without necessity of citation in normal on-line
communication provided only that said quotes are not represented as the
correspondent's original work. Permission for quotation of this
document in printed material and edited on-line communication (such as
the Info-Mac Digest and TidBITS) is given subject to normal citation
procedures (i.e. you have to say where you got it).
The file you are reading now contains only productivity
application specific information. This is the FOURTH part of the
this FAQ. Many other topics of interest to comp.sys.mac.apps readers
are covered in some of the other FAQs in the Macintosh newsgroups.
The first part is also posted to this newsgroup under the subject
heading "Introductory Macintosh frequently asked questions (FAQ)"
and includes a complete table of contents for the entire document as
well as information on where to post, ftp, file decompression,
trouble-shooting, and preventive maintenance. The second part is
posted to comp.sys.mac.system and features many questions about
system software. The third part is posted to comp.sys.mac.misc.
Both answer many questions that often erroneously appear in
comp.sys.mac.apps. Please familiarize yourself with all four
sections of this document before posting.
All pieces are available for anonymous ftp from rtfm.mit.edu
[18.70.0.224] in the directory pub/usenet/news.answers/macintosh.
Except for the introductory FAQ which appears in multiple newsgroups
and is stored as general-faq.Z, the name of each file has the format
of the last part of the group name followed by "-faq.Z", e.g the FAQ
for comp.sys.mac.system is stored as system-faq.Z and the FAQ for
comp.sys.mac.misc is stored as misc-faq.Z. RTFM stores files as
compressed (.Z) BINARY files. If you leave off the .Z at the end of
the file name when "getting" the file, rtfm will automatically
decompress the file before sending it to you. You can also have
these files mailed to you by sending an E-mail message to
mail-server@rtfm.mit.edu with the line: send
pub/usenet/news.answers/macintosh/"name" in the body text where
"name" is the name of the file you want as specified above (e.g.
general-faq). Send this server a message with the
subject "help" for more detailed instructions.
Disclaimer: I do my best to ensure that information contained
in this document is current and accurate, but I can accept no
responsibility for actions resulting from information contained
herein. This document is provided as is and with no warranty of
any kind. Corrections and suggestions should be addressed to
elharo@sunspot.noao.edu.
==================
WHAT'S THE BEST... (1.0)
==================
TEXT EDITOR? (1.1)
Available shareware and freeware text editors include McSink,
BBEdit Lite, Edit II (with grep style searching), Alpha (particularly
nice for use with TeX files), Stevie (for fans of vi), and microEmacs.
The feature sets of these editors overlap somewhat but are not
identical. Since all are available via anonymous FTP, there's
no reason not to try them all and find the one you like best.
I use Rich Siegel's BBEdit Lite for the FAQ because it can word
wrap to a specific number of characters and indent lines with spaces.
(You didn't think I did all this nice formatting by hand, did you?)
It's also a very nice programmer's editor. BBEdit has an extensive
interface for adding custom externals written in Think C so if you
need a feature that's not built-in you can add it. For me the only
thing that's missing is automatic word-wrap, but that's available
from the Text Editor Patches 1.2.5 by James W. Walker. Some others
may also miss a macro language that's easier to use than writing
code externals in C which brings us to my second choice.
Alpha ($25 shareware) is a text editor that includes a full
featured implementation of the tcl scripting language and extensive
search and replace capabilities. Emacs users will feel at home
with this powerful program. Unfortunately it's System 7 dependent.
Shareware authors take note: About 40% of all installed Macs are
still running System 6! If you actually intend to make some money,
then you shouldn't cut out half your market at a swipe.
Stevie is vi-workalike for the Mac, but since Stevie isn't
an interface to an ex-style editor as is vi, it's not as powerful
as its UNIX inspiration. microEmacs is likewise NOT a full featured
implementation of Emacs. If you want to do Emacs style Lisp
programming and keybinding (and I can't imagine why else anyone
would ever want to use Emacs on a Mac) you'll probably be happier
with Alpha.
WORD PROCESSOR? (1.2)
No single word processor manages to be all things to all people,
but one does come closer than others. Microsoft Word 5.1 covers
ALMOST every conceivable word processing need. You'll see a lot of
complaints about Word (and Microsoft) on the net, but that's a
function of its success. Word provides not only basic and advanced
word processing features (style sheets, spelling checker, thesaurus,
grammar checker, outliner, graphical and text-based equation editing,
on-line help, multiple import and export formats, etc. etc. etc.),
but many features more commonly associated with desktop publishing
software (text and picture boxes, tables, multiple column layouts,
indexing, EPS and TIFF importing, etc. etc. etc.) as well. While
most of these features are available in third party products for
other word processors, by the time you've bought the other word
processor and one or two add-ons you've already spent more than on
Word alone.
This kitchen sink approach does give Word somewhat large memory
and disk footprints. Word's most appropriate for Macs with at
least a 25MHz 68030 CPU, VRAM separate from main memory, and
ten or more free megs of hard disk space though it will run on
considerably weaker Macs. Most people won't actually need all of
Word's features and can save RAM and disk space by only installing
what they want. For instance I threw out Word's graphical equation
editor since I prefer to use Expressionist. Word 5.1 even has a
PowerBook install option that leaves out many optional extras so
as to take up less space on smaller hard disks. This may sound
wasteful, but it's almost guaranteed Word will have one or two
features you find you can't live without that just aren't
available in other packages.
Users with limited disk space, 68000 CPUs, or less than four
megabytes of memory may want to consider WriteNow 3.0, a word
processor noted for its speed, small memory appetite, minimal
disk footprint, and small price. ($60 bundled with various other
indispensable productivity tools like SimAnt :-) Unlike the other
products discussed here, WriteNow really is designed first and last
to be a word processor, not a document formatter. It doesn't have
multiple picture import formats, tables, an equation editor, or other
features more associated with desktop publishing than with writing.
If all you want to do is write, WriteNow may be the choice for you.
Users behind the power curve and even those out in front of it
may also want to consider ClarisWorks whose word processing functions
are more than sufficient for basic writing. While more expensive than
WriteNow, ClarisWorks also provides many other well-integrated features
in a very small and fast package.
Word's comprehensiveness makes its few missing features stand
out. Were any other word processor lacking what Word lacks you'd
never hear it. However Word is the champ and as such it's our duty
to find the holes in its armor (and there really aren't many.) Most
glaring is the lack of character based styles, an indispensable
feature (which fortunately you don't have to dispense with. See
question 2.1 below.) This is a basic feature present in almost all
other Macintosh word processors. How Microsoft missed this one I
don't know.
Almost equally conspicuous by its absence is automatic
cross-referencing. This wouldn't be missed in any other word
processor; but with Word's excellent outliner, multiple picture
import formats, equation editor, charting module, and automatic
generation of tables of contents, you'd think there would be a way to
link these together with a few numbers so I wouldn't have to sprinkle
my draft copies with statements like "See question x.x below" until I
knew exactly how many sections I'm going to have and where each
will be placed. Unfortunately there's not (though again see
section 2.2 below).
Among writers of technical documents that include many
numbered equations, tables, and figures, FrameMaker is particularly
popular. Unlike Word it has the cross-referencing capability to
match its tables, drawing package, and equation editor. However
FrameMaker really is more of a desktop publishing package than a
word processor, and it's priced like one. The educational discount
pricing for FrameMaker is close to the non-educational, street price
of Word 5.1 or WordPerfect and competitive upgrades are not available.
When starting a Framemaker document you need to give a lot more initial
thought to the layout of the page than you would with most word
processors. It's much harder to just launch FrameMaker and begin
writing than it is in any of the other word processors. FrameMaker
is not well suited to general use.
Another feature that wouldn't be missed in any word
processor besides Word is a built-in macro language. It's the sort
of thing that only wireheads could love; but there are a lot of
wireheads in Netland, and unfortunately for Microsoft some of them
took a look at Word for Windows where they found a built-in macro
language. One thing wireheads do not take lightly is having less
than state of the art software pawned off on them. Microsoft has
promised that a macro language will be built-in to Word 6.0 due this
winter, but they also promised that a macro language would be made
available for Word 5.0 as a plug-in module and they reneged on that
promise.
If you want powerful macros take a look at Nisus from Nisus
Software. Many netters swear by (and at) Nisus. Nisus 3.4 has has
several features not found in any other Macintosh word processor
including very powerful macros and full WorldScript support. It's
also missing many features included in other similarly priced
packages like tables, useable styles, and support for most System 7
features. The fully WorldScript savvy edition is copy-protected by
an ADB dongle, but if your writing is limited to Roman languages and
Japanese, the non-copy protected limited flag edition will serve
equally well.
MacWrite Pro 1.0 and WordPerfect 2.1 are solid products, but
neither has anything special to recommend it beyond the name of the
company that makes it. If these products were produced by Friendly
Neighborhood Software (tm) instead of Claris and WordPerfect, they
would have been eliminated from the market long ago.
GENEALOGY SOFTWARE? (1.3)
Leister Productions' Reunion is the most powerful, flexible,
graphical, and easy-to-use Macintosh software for producing family
trees and doing genealogical research. At $115 street it's also
the most expensive. Reunion is available from all the usual
sources of payware software. If all you want to do is chart your
own family tree back a few generations, you may want to consider
the less powerful and less flexible, but considerably cheaper
Personal Ancestry File (PAF for short) from the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter Day Saints (the Mormons for short). It's designed
primarily for easy downloading of data into the Mormons' central
database so it's not as easy to use as Reunion and lacks some basic
features. For instance there's no provision for children of
unmarried couples. PAF is, however, only $35. It must be ordered
directly from the Mormons at
Salt Lake Distribution Center
1999 West 1700 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84104
(800) 537-5950
The product number is #30992 (Macintosh) and an IBM version is also
available. MasterCard and Visa are accepted for a $2 fee. However
your card is charged for a cash advance rather than a purchase so
interest will begin accruing immediately and your credit card
company will probably tack on about a 2.5% cash advance fee.
Simple descendant and ancestor charts can be produced with the
shareware HyperCard stack Our Family Tree 1.2 by Timmy G. Bremer.
However this stack is limited compared to PAF and the much more
powerful Reunion. For instance, pedigree charts can only go back
five generations.
TEX? (1.4)
This is an easy choice depending on whether you're more
concerned with quality or price. Textures from Blue Sky Research
is easily the best implementation of TeX for the Mac. Andrew
Trevorrow's OzTeX, while not as sophisticated overall, is
shareware and available for anonymous ftp from midway.uchicago.edu
[128.135.12.73]. OzTeX files are also somewhat more easily exported
to TeX systems on other platforms. If you're mainly concerned with
printing or previewing the occasional TeX document that comes your
way, get OzTeX. However if you work with TeX on a daily basis,
Textures at $195 student price is worth a look. Blue Sky
Research is famous on the net for technical support that should
be a model for the industry. For more information send E-mail
to sales@bluesky.com.
A new TeX for the Mac, CMacTeX, was recently released
by Tom Kiffe and is available for anonymous ftp from math.tamu.edu.
[128.194.7.40]. CMacTeX is more modular than other TeX's for the
Mac. The different pieces of the full TeX package like dvipreview,
tex, and metafont are all available separately. CMacTeX comes in
both freeware and commercial versions. The commercial version
includes the "big" TeX and Metafont packages.
INTEGRATED APPLICATION? (1.5)
Most software is driven by the needs of power users. Features
are added to sell into the power-user segment of the market since
they're the hardest to please and spend the most dollars. Triple
Omega Paperware Corp. and its competitors need to design cocktail
napkins in 16,000,000 lifelike, mouthwatering colors so
Big Software Inc. has its programmers spend many hours adding
photorealistic color capability to Bloated Draw 7.2. Meanwhile
Father O'Brian finds he needs all the hard disk space on his Color
Classic and more money than he gets in the collection plate on
a good Sunday just to purchase and install Bloated Draw 7.2,
SuperDuperPublisher 3.8, and WhizzyWriter 9.7 so he can make a
brochure with a picture of a hamburger to advertise the upcoming
CYO dinner. Integrated applications provide the tools for Father
O'Brien to create his brochure at a price, both in money and system
resources, that won't require him to rob the poorbox.
Very few Mac users really push our $200 software packages to
the limit. Even people who do use Word 5.1 to the fullest may
not come close to utilizing the power of Excel or Canvas, and
vice-versa. An integrated package omits the 80% of features that
90% of users never touch. Thus we get the 20% of features that
we actually do use in several areas for less than the price of a
full featured application in any one of those areas. Integrated
applications also pack these features into a smaller, faster
package ideal for users with 68000 Macs or small hard disks. The
basic components of an integrated package include a word processor,
drawing application, spreadsheet, database, charting module, and
telecommunications. Some integrated apps also include painting
(ClarisWorks, WordPerfect Works, and GreatWorks), outlining
(ClarisWorks, GreatWorks), and even presentation
(ClarisWorks) modules.
ClarisWorks is undoubtedly the best integrated package for
the Mac (which of course means it's easily the best integrated
package anywhere, but you knew that already. :-) ClarisWorks 1.0
did what was previously thought to be impossible. It destroyed a
virtual Microsoft monopoly in a market, something no one had ever
before achieved though many had tried. The virtual dethroning of
market leader Microsoft Works by the upstart Claris ought to
serve as a lesson to any company that thinks market dominance can
substitute for solid, improving products. It also proved for the
first time that even as a wholly owned Apple subsidiary Claris was
capable of turning out a market leading product, something they'd
never done before. With the release of version 2.0 the gap between
ClarisWorks and everyone else became a chasm. Though other
integrated packages like Symantec's GreatWorks and WordPerfect
Works offer a few features not found in Claris Works and vice
versa, (Noone agrees on exactly how much should be included in an
integrated package.) none of the other packages are as well
integrated, well designed, and easy to use as ClarisWorks. I
strongly recommend ClarisWorks as the first software for new Mac
users, and an essential tool for PowerBook 100 owners.
SPREADSHEET? (1.6)
The best professional's spreadsheet is undoubtedly Microsoft
Excel. It's so far out in front of its competition, there really
isn't any point in giving an exhaustive list of why it's better.
While there are occasional reasons one might want to use Wingz,
Resolve, or Lotus 1-2-3 instead, they all fall into the "If you
have to ask..." category. Since Claris is quietly dropping work
on Resolve, I particularly recommend that you do not buy Resolve
unless you absolutely have to.
However if you're less than a real power-user of
spreadsheets, you may want to take a look at two excellent
shareware packages, BiPlane and Mariner which retail for about 20%
of the street prices of their payware counterparts and offer the
20% of spreadsheet features 90% of spreadsheet users spend 100%
of their time using. Both are available from the usual sources
of shareware. You may also want to consider one of the
integrated packages such as ClarisWorks. For less than the
price of a full-blown spreadsheet, you get a medium-sized
spreadsheet with all the basic features except macros, and
a damned good word processor and graphics package to boot.
JPEG VIEWER? (1.7)
Storm Technology's Picture Decompress shows JPEG's on all
Macs with 32-bit QuickDraw. Aaron Giles' JPEGView previews JPEG
files on System 7 Macs with QuickTime installed. PictPixie, a
QuickTime development tool from Apple, also allows Macs with 32-bit
QuickDraw and QuickTime to display JPEG's but requires enormous
amounts of memory. All are free; the first two are available from
the regular archive sites, the last from ftp.apple.com in
/dts/mac/quicktime. JPEGView and PictPixie not only display
JPEG's but can also convert them to Quicktime format. Kevin
Mitchell's GifConverter, $45 shareware, can read and dither JPEG's
on any Mac running System 6.0.5 or later regardless of the presence
of Quicktime and 32-bit Quickdraw.
One more free product worthy of mention is Jim Brunner's
JPEG Convert which translates JPEG format files to GIF's on any
Macintosh, albeit with some loss of resolution. They can then
be viewed with any Gif viewer like QuickGif or GifConverter.
ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING SOFTWARE? (1.8)
Professional electronic publishers tend to swear by either
QuarkXPress or Aldus Pagemaker, typically because they haven't
tried the other package. The interface metaphors of the two
products are quite different, and forcing your mind to switch
between the two is non-trivial. However many people have made the
effort to switch to Quark. Few have moved the other direction
unless forced.
Quark offers more control over the placement of objects on the
page and various color effects than does PageMaker. This makes
Quark particularly popular for advertising and other layouts
that don't look like traditional books and magazines. For instance
I can't imagine laying out Mondo 2000 or Spy in PageMaker. In
Quark it might actually be fun. This is not to say that such
things can't be done; the MacWarehouse catalog is done with
Pagemaker; but Quark is certainly easier to use for this sort of
free-form layout. Pagemaker fits a more traditional layout like
MacWeek's where everything fits neatly into non-overlapping
rectangular columns and boxes with occasional pull quotes.
Aldus has been playing catch-up with Quark for several years
now, and with the recent release of PageMaker 5.0 they may finally
have pulled even. The two products still aren't equal (Quark's
XTensions are superior to Aldus Additions; PageMaker's book
publishing features like automatic indexing are non-existent in
Quark.) but they are roughly comparable. PageMaker is a little
more expensive, but Aldus provides much better support. For
users just starting out I recommend PageMaker.
Many people choose PageMaker because its simpler interface
makes it easier to use for simple black and white newsletters,
books, and other printed matter that doesn't push the art of
electronic publishing to its limits. However if this is all
you want, you may be surprised at just how well today's word
processors fit your needs. With text and picture boxes,
styles, multi-column capabilities, sectioning, EPS import, and many
other features traditionally associated with desktop publishing,
word processors like Word 5.1, WordPerfect, and even ClarisWorks
can do a surprisingly professional job when producing relatively
simple documents. These features may not be obvious (especially
in Word 5.1) but they are present, and for considerably less money
than Pagemaker.
DRAWING APPLICATION? (1.9)
For sheer artistic capability Aldus Freehand and Adobe
Illustrator have been playing leapfrog with each other for years,
and neither company shows any signs of letting up soon. As
of this writing Illustrator is probably slightly out in front,
particularly with the recent release of Adobe Dimensions; but
most people feel more comfortable with whichever program they
learned first since the interfaces of the two packages are
somewhat different.
Both Illustrator and Freehand are designed for tasks that would
traditionally have been accomplished by freehand drawing. If your
drawing tends more towards the technical than the artistic, you'll
probably be happier with Canvas 3.0 which has a superior interface
for object alignment and drawing to scale. Illustrator and Freehand
can do pretty much anything Canvas can and vice-versa; but having the
right package does make particular jobs easier. If your pictures
will consist mainly of smooth curves, Illustrator or Freehand will
suit you better.
All of the above packages are geared toward serious artists and
professional designers and are priced accordingly. For occasional
drawing by non-professionals any of the integrated packages such
as ClarisWorks will likely serve well for a substantially smaller
investment of time, money, and disk space.
==============
MICROSOFT WORD (2.0)
==============
HOW CAN I ASSIGN STYLES TO CHARACTERS? (2.1)
Once you've used character based styles it's almost impossible
to imagine document formatting without them. After all, just because
you want equations to be formatted in 10 point I Times Italic or
references to menu choices in 12 point Chicago doesn't mean you want
the entire paragraph in that font; but that seems to be the only
choice Word offers. It's truly a shame that a program that makes
working with styles so easy via its ribbon bar and customizable
command key equivalents that can be attached to common styles doesn't
let the user attach styles to less than a paragraph of text at a time.
There is, however, a work-around. Unless you're one of the
fifteen people who actually use color text, you've got six unused
character formats called Blue, Cyan, Green, Magenta, Red, and Yellow
available in the Format Character dialog box and via user-assignable
Command-Keys. (There's also Black and White but using those two will
mess with the normal appearance of your document.) Pick a color for
each different character-based style you want to use and mark your
text with the appropriate color. Then, before saving the document,
do a global Find and Replace for each color; i.e. find the color and
replace with the style attributes like font and font size.
HOW CAN I GENERATE AUTOMATIC CROSS-REFERENCES IN WORD? (2.2)
Matthew Nodine's WordRef 1.4.1 (shareware, $25) uses some truly
inspired hacks to make cross-referencing and auto-numbering of
figures, tables, sections, equations or whatever else you might care
to count almost simple. (It can't be made genuinely simple until
Microsoft incorporates these features directly into Word.) WordRef
will also automatically generate BibTeX style bibliographies. The
writer defines variables for each reference or number series while
writing. These variables can be operated on by various arithmetic
and logical operators (so a little programming experience is helpful
though not absolutely necessary.) When you're ready to prepare a
draft, WordRef will resolve all references and citations into Word
PrintMerge variables. Then PrintMerge produces the final output.
The procedure is more complicated than it would need to be if
Microsoft incorporated these features into Word, but for the moment
WordRef 1.4.1 should serve most users' cross-referencing needs well.
HOW CAN I CHANGE A WORD DOCUMENT TO TEX? AND VICE-VERSA? (2.3)
Brian Jefferies of the University of New South Wales has written
the program RTF->TeX to convert files Word files saved in RTF
format into plain TeX files. RTF->TeX is less than robust. Among
other deficiencies it ignores paragraph and character formatting
and will not handle equations written with the Equation Editor
(though it will try to convert equations written in Word's built-in
formula setting language.) However RTF->TeX is a useful tool to
handle a lot of the grunt work of preprocessing documents before
finishing the conversion by hand.
There are no Macintosh tools to go the other direction,
i.e. to change a TeX file into a Word file. There are several Unix
programs, noteably detex, that will strip out TeX formatting codes
as part of a conversion from TeX to plain ASCII which can of course
be read by most Mac word processors.
SOME BOZO PERSONALIZED ALL OUR COPIES OF WORD WITH THE NAME
"JOHN HOLMES'S PENIS" AND THE ORGANIZATION "MICROSLUTS." HOW
DO I CHANGE THIS? (2.4)
BEFORE installing any software you should lock all the master
disks, make a backup of all the master disks, and install from the
backups. Since some installers now check for specific bits on the
installer floppy, use DiskCopy to make the backup of the master
disks. DiskCopy also copies floppies more quickly on a one-floppy
system than the Finder. This is especially true for recent Microsoft
applications like Word and Excel that write personalization info on
the master disks. If you need to do multiple installs such as from
the single set of disks Microsoft sends with its site licenses, you
don't need to make a backup for every computer you'll be installing
on. Instead just copy the original, pre-personalization Installer
application onto your hard drive and replace the one on the floppy
with the clean copy from your hard drive after every install.
If the disks have already been personalized, get the freeware
Anonymity 1.2. Make a copy of Word on your hard drive and then
"Zap" it with Anonymity. This removes the personalization
information. The next time Word is launched it will prompt you for
the personalization information. If you're using Word 5.0 or 5.1
you'll then be asked to insert the "Install" disk. Don't! Instead
click Cancel. Word will now display a dialog telling you how nice
it's being for letting you use your software even though you're
obviously a nasty, evil pirate. Click OK. Then quit Word. Launch
Word again, cancel out of the dialog asking for the Install floppy
again, acknowledge the anti-piracy message again, and quit Word
again. Repeat this three more times. The sixth time you launch
Word it should have given up on ever getting you to give it the
master Install floppy and will stop asking for it.
WHERE CAN I GET MORE INFORMATION? (2.5)
A FAQ list for the Word-for-Mac mailing list is archived at
alsvid.une.edu.au in pub/archives/word-mac/FAQ. This archive
stores both the full FAQ list and individual questions with
reasonably descriptive titles. Answers are available for many
more detailed and advanced questions than are covered here.
=========
TEACHTEXT (3.0)
=========
HOW CAN I CHANGE THE FONT IN TEACHTEXT? (3.1)
Make a copy of TeachText 7.0 and open the COPY with ResEdit.
Open CODE resource 1. You'll probably be warned that the resource is
stored compressed and that opening it will irreversibly decompress
it. Click OK. Scroll down to address 4A88. You should see the hex
string "0001 A887". A887 is the call to TextFont(). The four hex
digits preceding it (0001) are the font ID. Change this number to
the ID (in hexadecimal) of the font you want. Monaco would be
0004. (It may be something else if Monaco has been renumbered
on your system.)
To change the size go to the next line (4A90) and look for
"000C A88A" A88A is the call to TextSize(). The four hex digits
preceding it are the size of the font to be used. Change "000C" to
the size (in hex) you want. For instance 0009 is nine-point, 0010
would be sixteen point.
Changing the font and size can adversely affect the way
TeachText displays embedded pictures which most commonly occur in
read-only TeachText documents (the ones with the little newspaper
icons) so you may want to finish your modifications by deleting FREF
resource 130 to prevent your modified TeachText from opening those
files. Save your changes and quit.
HOW DO I PLACE A PICTURE IN A TEACHTEXT FILE? (3.2)
I recommend the shareware program Belgian Postcards by
AIGS and Karl Pottie. While the interface is not very well
thought out, it does make placing pictures in TeachText
documents easier than any other utility or technique.
HOW DO I MAKE A TEACH-TEXT DOCUMENT READ ONLY? (3.3)
Use ResEdit or any other file typer utility to change
the file's type to 'ttro.' The above-mentioned Belgian
Postcards will also save (and edit) files in this format.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold National Solar Observatory
eharold@sunspot.noao.edu Sunspot NM 88349
---